联系我们

收益核算工具

收益核算工具
marSeal

marSeal

可重复使用的封闭系统 marSeal 可确保静脉、动脉和组织束永久且安全地闭合,并随后进行分离。

To the marSeal cost-benefit calculator

ERROR: Content Element with uid "31783" and type "contentelements_electro_calculator" has no rendering definition!

前往收益核算工具

灭菌容器

我们针对灭菌产品供应的包装系统,既能最大限度地保障患者安全,又能优化日常的消毒供应中心工作流程。 
单击此处访问我们 microStop®、marSafe® 和 marSafe® plus 容器系列的收益核算工具。 

前往收益核算工具
Please select a product:
Please select your currency:
Size Number of pieces Price per piece 600x300x110 600x300x160 600x300x270
Size Number of pieces Price per piece 600x300x140 600x300x210
470x300x110 470x300x160
470x300x140
300x300x110 300x300x160 300x300x270
300x300x140 300x300x210
Total price

Notice: Realistic is an avarage of about 120 cycles per year / per container which corresponds to 2.3 cycles per week

Comparison with alternative system

Total costs KLS Martin product

Total costs 5 years

Total costs 10 years

Total costs alternative system

Total costs alternative system 5 years

Total costs alternative system 10 years

Payback period

Years

Weeks

Comparison with soft packaging

Payback period

Years

Weeks

Break even number of containered/wrapped sets:

Sustainable Impact*

Wrapping material

CO₂ Footprint in kg until payback day

CO₂ Footprint in kg in 10 years

Rigid container from KLS Martin

CO₂ Footprint in kg until payback day

CO₂ Footprint in kg in 10 years

The production of a container already causes 30 kg CO₂ footprint before use. This is taken into account in the calculation. 

Total costs of ownership**

Wrapping material two step

TCO until investment payback day

TCO in 5 years

TCO in 10 years

Wrapping material single step

TCO until investment payback day

TCO in 5 years

TCO in 10 years

Rigid container from KLS Martin

TCO until investment payback day

TCO in 5 years

TCO in 10 years

Download results as PDF:

An error occurred and the file could not be downloaded. Please try again later or change your input.

* Friedericy, H. J., van Egmond, C. W., Vogtländer, J. G., van der Eijk, A. C., & Jansen, F. W. (2021).Reducing the Environmental Impact of Sterilization Packaging for Surgical Instruments in the Operating Room: A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Disposable versus Reusable Systems. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(1), [430]. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010430

** Krohn et al., “Analysis of processes and costs of alternative packaging options of sterile goods in hospitals - a case study in two German hospitals”. Health Econ Rev.2019 Jan 17;9(1):1.

本网站使用第三方网站跟踪技术提供服务。我同意,并可以随时撤回或更改我的同意,并在未来生效。

拒绝 设置 接受 公司信息数据保护